Facebook Pixel
Brookbush Institute Logo

Tuesday, June 6, 2023

The Comparative Effects of Eccentric Muscle Contractions in the Treatment of Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy

Brent Brookbush

Brent Brookbush

DPT, PT, MS, CPT, HMS, IMT

Research Review: Comparison of effects of eccentric training, eccentric-concentric training, and eccentric-concentric training combined with isometric contraction in the treatment of lateral elbow tendinopathy.

By Nate Missler MOT, OTR/L

Edited by Brent Brookbush DPT, PT, COMT, MS, PES, CES, CSCS, ACSM H/FS

Original Citation: Stasinopoulos, D., & Stasinopoulos, I. (2017). Comparison of effects of eccentric training, eccentric-concentric training, and eccentric-concentric training combined with isometric contraction in the treatment of lateral elbow tendinopathy. Journal of Hand Therapy, 30, 13-19. ABSTRACT

Why the Study is Relevant: Lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET), also known as “tennis elbow”, is a common forearm pathology, resulting in localized pain around the lateral epicondyle of the humerus and pain with gripping and/or wrist extension (1). Studies have demonstrated that eccentric exercise may be effective for LET; however, the combined effect of eccentric, concentric and isometric exercise has yet to be studied (2 - 4). This 2016 study by Stasinopoulos et al. compared the effects of eccentric training, eccentric-concentric training, and eccentric-concentric plus isometric wrist extension exercises in participants with LET. The findings suggest that eccentric-concentric training combined with isometric exercise is most effective for addressing symptoms of LET.

Dr. Brookbush instructs Krystal Salvent on performing a therapeutic exercise for forearm dysfunction called a "Reverse Tyler Twist"
Caption: Dr. Brookbush instructs Krystal Salvent on performing a therapeutic exercise for forearm dysfunction called a "Reverse Tyler Twist"

Tyler Twist performed by Krystal Salvent with instruction from Dr. Brookbush (c) Brookbush Institute

Study Summary

Study DesignRandomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
Level of EvidenceIB Evidence from at least one randomized controlled trial
Participant Characteristics

Number of participants: 34 (19 female, 15 male)

Mean age: Approximately 43 years old

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically diagnosed LET for at least 4 weeks
    • Reported pain on the facet of the lateral epicondyle with palpation
    • Decreased pain during resisted supination with elbow in 90 degrees of flexion, when compared to supination in full extension
    • Pain reported during at least two of the following tests:
      • Tomsen test (resisted wrist extension)
      • Resisted middle finger test
      • Mill's test (full passive flexion of the wrist)
      • Handgrip dynamometer test

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any of the following:
    • Dysfunction in the shoulder, neck (radiculopathy), and/or thoracic region
    • Local or generalized arthritis
    • Neurologic deficit
    • Radial nerve entrapment
    • Limitations in arm functions
    • Operations on affected elbow
    • Previous conservative treatment for LET

Methodology

Participants were randomly placed into three groups:

Group A: Eccentric training

  • Eccentric wrist extensors contractions were performed with the elbow in full extension, the forearm in pronation, the wrist in an extended position, and the hand positioned off the end of the bed.

Participants allowed the wrist to slowly flex for 30 seconds and then returned the wrist to the starting position with the assistance of the un-involved hand.

Group B: Eccentric-concentric training

  • Participants performed eccentric wrist extensors contractions with the elbow in full extension, the forearm in pronation, the wrist in an extended position, and the hand off the end of the bed.

Participants allowed the wrist to slowly flex for 30 seconds and then returned the wrist to the starting position (full extension) with no assistance from un-involved hand.

Group C: Eccentric-concentric with isometric training

  • Same protocol as in Group B, with the addition of an isometric wrist extension contraction performed for 45 seconds after the involved wrist returned to starting position.

In each session, participants performed three sets of 15 repetitions, with 1-minute inter-set rest intervals.

Participants performed static stretching of the wrist extensors 3 times prior to and after exercise, holding each for 30-45 seconds.

The exercise program was performed 5 times a week for 4 weeks.

Data Collection and AnalysisAnalysis:
  • A one-way ANOVA was used to determine baseline status change in each outcome measure between each group.
  • A paired t-test was used to measure the differences in all groups compared to baseline.
  • Bonferroni test comparisons were conducted when significant difference was determined using the one-way ANOVA (p <0.05).
Outcome MeasuresMeasured at baseline (Week 0), the end of the program (Week 4) and 1 month after the program (Week 8).
  • Pain and function were measured using a VAS scale (0 = least pain, 10 = worst pain; 0 = no function, 10 = full function)
  • Pain-free grip strength (the amount of force in pounds before pain) was measured using a hand dynamometer.
ResultsANOVA revealed no significant difference at baseline between groups. At Week 4 and at Week 8, a significant difference in magnitude was recorded between groups, so Bonferroni post hoc tests were performed.
  • Pain recorded on VAS scale at Week 8
    • Eccentric training
      • 2.9 (+/- 1.0)

    • Eccentric-concentric training
      • 2.6 (+/- 1.0)

    • Eccentric-concentric with isometric training
      • 1.6 (+/- 0.6)

  • Function recorded on VAS scale at Week 8
    • Eccentric training
      • 7.0 (+/- 0.7)

    • Eccentric-concentric training
      • 7.3 (+/- 1.0)

    • Eccentric-concentric with isometric training
      • 8.2 (+/- 0.7)

  • Pain-free grip strength (lb) at Week 8
    • Eccentric training
      • 64.0 (+/- 8.1)

    • Eccentric-concentric training
      • 67.5 (+/- 7.5)

    • Eccentric-concentric with isometric training
      • 75.4 (+/- 9.7)

Our ConclusionsThe findings suggest that although eccentric exercise is effective for addressing symptoms of LET, eccentric-concentric contractions combined with isometrics may be more effective. Human movement professionals may consider these findings when optimizing exercise selection for individuals presenting with LET and forearm dysfunction.
Researchers' Conclusions

“The results of this trial indicate that eccentric-concentric training combined with isometric contraction produced the largest treatment effect at the end of treatment and follow-up.”

Wrist Extension Inhibitation

Review & Commentary:

This study adds to a growing body of research investigating treatment of lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) by comparing 3 exercise protocols; eccentric-concentric, eccentrics, and eccentric-concentric and isometrics (2-4). This study suggests that the best outcomes were achieved using a combination of eccentric-concentric and isometric contractions.

  • This study had many strengths, including:
    • To our knowledge, this study is the first to compare 3 commonly used exercise protocols for addressing LET based on pain, strength and perceived function.
    • The researchers should be applauded for the use of a randomized control trial design; a challenging and rare methodology in research comparing exercise intervention.
    • Individuals were initially assessed, assessed again after 4 weeks of treatment, and then assessed 4 weeks post treatment to determine the carry-over of each protocol.
  • Weaknesses that should be noted prior to clinical integration of the findings include:
    • The participants were all active tennis players, which may reduce the generalizability of the study to other populations.
    • The exercise programs were not progressed throughout the study. Progressing acute variables (sets, reps, load, complexity) may have enhanced the results of treatment, and may also have demonstrated that progressing from one protocol to the next is superior to any one protocol.
    • Additional assessments highlighting movement impairment, and/or changes in objective assessments for grip strength, manual muscle testing weakness, and/or range of motion would have added to the clinical relevance of the study.

How This Study is Important:

To our knowledge, this is the first randomized, comparative study of exercise protocols using various combinations of contractions for the treatment of LET. Although research support the use of eccentric training alone (4), this study implies that a mix of contraction types is preferable.

How the Findings Apply to Practice:

The findings demonstrate that adding isometric, concentric and eccentric wrist extension exercise to a rehabilitation program for individuals with LET is more effective in decreasing pain and improving function. That is, a combination of contraction types is more effective than a program designed to emphasize one contraction type. It should be noted that all 3 protocols used in this study were effective, that a progression of exercise protocols was not tested, and there may be benefit to progressing from one contraction type to multiple contraction types over a treatment period.

How does it relate to Brookbush Institute Content?

The Brookbush Institute (BI) uses an integrated approach to addressing postural dysfunction and movement impairment . Although a predictive model of forearm dysfunction has yet to be published, early hypotheses of osteokinematic dysfunction include excessive pronation, ulnar deviation and wrist extension. This study supports the use of exercise, including concentric, eccentric and isometric contractions, for forearm and elbow dysfunction, specially lateral elbow tendinopathy.

The BI addresses over-active muscle groups with self-administered release techniques , lengthening techniques and may reinforce those techniques with inhibition taping  and under-active muscles are addressed with activation techniques, followed by function activities. Sample videos of techniques used for the treatment of elbow/forearm/wrist dysfunction below:

Wrist Extensor Self-administered Static Release

Flexor (Wrist) Activation

Flexor Carpi Radialis Activation:

Reverse Tyler Twist - Wrist Flexor Isolated Activation

Wrist Extensor Inhibition Taping

Bibliography:

  1. Bisset, L.M., Vicenzino, B. (2015). Physiotherapy management of lateral epicondylalgia. Journal of Physiotherapy, 61(4), 174-181.
  2. Peterson, M., Bulter, S., Eriksson, M., & Svardsudd, K. (2014). A randomized controlled trial of eccentric vs. concentric graded exercise in chronic tennis elbow (lateral elbow tendinopathy). Clinical Rehabilitation, 28(9), 862-872.
  3. Raman, J., MacDermid, J.C., & Grewal, R. (2012). Effectiveness of different methods of resistance exercises in lateral epicondylosis - a systematic review. Journal of Hand Therapy, 25, 5-26.
  4. Martinez-Silvestrini, J.A., Newcomer, K.L., Gay, R.E., Schaefer, M.P., Korebein, P., & Arendt, K.W. (2005). Chronic lateral epicondylitis: comparative effectiveness of a home exercise program including stretching alone versus stretching supplemented with eccentric or concentric strengthening. Journal of Hand Therapy, 18, 411-420.

© 2017 Brent Brookbush

Questions, comments, and criticisms are welcomed and encouraged -

Comments

Guest